Last Call: A mathematical law explains why I like mini candies

Illustration for article titled Last Call: A mathematical law explains why I like mini candies
Photo: Victor Spinelli (Getty Images)
Last CallLast CallLast Call is The Takeout’s online watering hole where you can chat, share recipes, and use the comment section as an open thread. Here’s what we’ve been reading/watching/listening around the office today.

As previously stated, I prefer miniature Reese’s to the full-sized cups. In fact, I prefer most miniature candy bars to their standard equivalents. I justify this preference texturally: There seem to be more crunchy edges to mini candies.

Today I learned that no less than legendary astronomer Galileo Galilei has a mathematical law that explains my preference. His square-cube law, credited to him though other scientists and even lay people like myself intuitively understand it, states the ratio of two volumes is greater than the ratio of their surfaces. Put another way, if a solid object shrinks, its volume shrinks more than its surface area does.

Ergo! A miniature candy has a higher surface-to-filling ratio, which I like. The square-cube law also has implications for biomechanics and rocket engines—but we’re just here to debate mini vs. full-sized candies, right?

Kate Bernot is a freelance writer and a certified beer judge. She was previously managing editor at The Takeout.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


My main objection to the mini-Reese’s cup is the amount of time spent unwrapping the damn things. It’s all shuck and no corn.

Now, you start talking to me about those Twix or Kit-Kat minis that come in the eight-ounce single-serving bag for four bucks, then I’m right with you on the superiority of the mini as sugar bomb platform.