Report: Low-calorie ice cream might just be an oxymoron

Illustration for article titled Report: Low-calorie ice cream might just be an oxymoron
Photo: Kirk McKoy/Los Angeles Times (Getty Images)

We all scream for ice cream. So too have doctors and other health experts, in futility and for decades now, about the delicious and unhealthy nature of America’s favorite frozen treat.

Advertisement

Presently, the take-home ice cream market is as crowded as it’s ever been. There are still your “full-fat” varieties, the traditionally thick and creamy dessert treats. There’s frozen yogurt, which is lower in fat but still derived from cultured milk. There’s the growing popularity of gelato and its own permutations, along with non-dairy frozen desserts, or increasingly popular “light” ice cream options like Halo Top.

However, in addition to some taking umbrage with the idea of “diet ice cream” out of hand, skepticism remains about just how much healthier any kind of ice cream can really be. In that spirit, a recent Consumer Reports study put Halo Top and other non-dairy ice creams to the test, with 13 traditional and non-traditional vanilla offerings being evaluated for both quality and relative nutritional value. Their method saw that “Each product was rated for taste and texture along with healthiness—including nutrition and ingredients—or the lack of it.”

Advertisement

It likely won’t come as much of a shock to hear that, while the vegan and low-calorie options were moderately healthier, ice cream is still ice cream, and should thus be enjoyed in moderation:

The nondairy desserts had 2 to 14 grams of saturated fat per serving; the full-fat ice cream had 4 grams of saturated fat. Sugars also varied, from 4 grams up to 16 grams per half-cup serving. Still, the nondairy products we tested tended to lack many of the additives found in the light/low-fat ice creams. And they were tasty, too, with three getting Very Good sensory scores.

And look, it’s Friday. The Takeout really isn’t trying to get into the business of scolding people about their dessert preferences. We stand on the record as proudly pro-dessert, if anything. But the report offers another valuable reminder that health-food advertising is still just another kind of marketing, and that it’s probably not nutritionally advantageous to eat a full pint of any dessert.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

Yeah, as someone who is constantly off/on the wagon of eating less- I honestly think that Halo Top is for folks who need to eat ice cream AND are people who don’t do moderation as well (which is sometimes me!).

It’s possible to fit a whole pint into your calorie alottment for the day- but it’s not as good as regular ice cream. You could also fit in a bit of regular ice cream measured correctly in your day just as easily- but being able to chow down on a full pint of something and still not blow a day is good for people’s moral.

I will say the ben and jerry’s that I made into 8 servings was BETTER than one pint of halo top BUT the morale part mixed with a bulk eater mindset that a lot of us who struggle with weight have? I think these things are why people flock to these options.