Bud Light becomes first American beer labeled with nutritional facts

Illustration for article titled Bud Light becomes first American beer labeled with nutritional facts
Photo: Bud Light

Almost any packaged item we consume has an ingredients or nutritional label, even bottled water. But not beer—until now. Anheuser-Busch InBev announced today Bud Light will be the first American beer sold in a package containing a list of ingredients and serving facts. The new packaging is expected to hit shelves in February.


According to a press release, in addition to an ingredients list (water, barley, rice, hops), the label will list serving size, calories (110 per 12-ounce can), total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, carbohydrates (6.5 grams), sugars and protein. A spokesperson for Anheuser-Busch tells The Takeout the labels will appear on secondary packaging—so, not the bottles or cans themselves—of Bud Light 6-packs, 12-packs, and 24-packs. The company is touting this new package as a victory for “increased transparency,” but it’s also a smart competitive move.

Light beers obviously contain fewer calories than other beers, and American light lagers contain markedly fewer calories than many of their craft beer counterparts. That’s because light beers have fewer residual sugars and often, less alcohol, than craft beer, both of which contribute to calorie counts. A 12-ounce bottle of Founders Breakfast Stout, for example, contains 270 calories, more than twice that of a Bud Light; a Sierra Nevada IPA contains 231 calories. (If you want to do a rough estimate of your beers’ calories, multiply its ABV by 2.5, then multiply that by how many ounces you’re drinking.)

Anheuser-Busch InBev is probably betting that some consumers—ones who are already considering light beer—will be pleased to see that 110-calorie number on the label. Anecdotally, I’ve noticed that drinkers of hard seltzers like White Claw and Truly Spiked often cite its 100-calorie count as a major factor in their decision to buy it.

Of course, most craft beer drinkers aren’t under the assumption that their favorite IPA is a health food. But large beer companies are betting that there are enough consumers who will be swayed by the lower calorie counts to make it worth listing those on packaging. In July 2016, the Beer Institute—a trade group representing big beer companies like Anheuser-Busch, MillerCoors, HeinekenUSA, Constellation Brands Beer Division and others—announced its Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, a commitment to adding a serving facts statement and freshness code dating to all participating breweries’ beers by 2020. The Insitute’s members, who make up 81 percent of the beer volume sold in the U.S., signed on to participate.

Bud Light may have led the charge on ingredients and nutritional info on beer labels, but it’s only a preview of what’s to come from some of America’s biggest beer brands.

Kate Bernot is a freelance writer and a certified beer judge. She was previously managing editor at The Takeout.


Actually Kate, my brewer hero Bert Grant first did this long ago and got in big trouble!

Grant also took on the Federal Government. As he —and we fellow maltworms— knew, beer is liquid bread. So, he asked, in 1992, why shouldn’t there be nutritional information on beer labels? In answer, he put nutritional specifications on six-pack carriers of his Scottish Ale.

Unfortunately, the government didn’t agree with his assessment.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) determined that putting nutritional information on a beer label might confuse consumers into thinking that beer actually had nutritional value, just as, say, a Twinkie might, which is required to have a nutritional label. Specifically: “any reference to vitamin content in the advertising of malt beverages would mislead a substantial number of persons to believe that consumption of the product would produce curative or therapeutic effects.” The Bureau ordered him to cease and desist forthwith.