Subway sues journalists for reporting its chicken is only 50% chicken—and loses

Illustration for article titled Subway sues journalists for reporting its chicken is only 50% chicken—and loses
Photo: MikeyGen73 (iStock)

If you’ve ever thought that there was something a bit... off about Subway’s chicken, well, you are not alone. Back in 2017, a team of reporters for the Canadian Broadcast Corporation program Marketplace were curious, too. They sent samples of Subway chicken, along with chicken from A&W, McDonald’s, Tim Horton’s, and Wendy’s, to a lab at Trent University in Peterborough, Ontario, to test how much of it was actually, you know, chicken. They weren’t expecting anything to come back as 100%—things happen during processing and seasoning—but most of the tests came back showing between 88.5% and 89.4% chicken DNA. Except for Subway. Subway’s “oven roasted chicken” tested as 53.6% chicken and its strips were 42.8%. The rest was soy protein. Perhaps, they thought, there had been a mistake in the lab. But when they tested again, the results were the same.

Advertisement

Because they are journalists, the Marketplace team broadcast the results of the study, but not before giving Subway a chance to respond. Subway, predictably, was not pleased. It was so displeased, in fact, that it did what any unhappy corporate entity (or U.S. congressman) would do: It filed a $210 million defamation suit, claiming that the story was “recklessly and maliciously” published and that the study itself “lacked scientific rigor.” When the suit went to court, the chain submitted its own scientific evidence that its chicken was less than 1% filler.

Happily for the CBC, though maybe not for Subway, the suit was dismissed by the Ontario Superior Court earlier this week, Vice reports. “The Marketplace report raised a quintessential consumer protection issue,” Justice E.M. Morgan wrote in his ruling. “There are few things in society of more acute interest to the public than what they eat. To the extent that Subway’s products are consumed by a sizable portion of the public, the public interest in their composition is not difficult to discern and is established on the evidence.”

Advertisement

But this is not the end of it, not by a long shot. In Canada, as in the U.S., losers in lawsuits can appeal, and that is exactly what Subway plans to do. “The CBC Marketplace story at issue is wholly inaccurate and built on flawed research,” a spokesperson told Vice, “which caused significant harm to our network of Franchise Owners.”

Still, the disparity between the two scientific tests, not to mention the disparity between Subway and the other chains in the original test, does make one wonder.

Aimee Levitt is associate editor of The Takeout.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

vincenchips
vincenchips

It doesn’t really taste like chicken, not really a mystery to me. If you were to grill some chicken strips and taste it side by side with Subway you’d notice pretty quickly you were dealing with a different kind of protein. Obviously Subway has the money and motivation to fight it, but I hope they lose.

Side note, a friend of mine once pointed out to me in college that all their meat tastes basically the same. I couldn’t really argue otherwise. It’s just mystery meat with different toppings on mediocre bread.