Welcome to Chocolate Chip Cookie Week, celebrating one of America’s most iconic and widely loved comfort foods.
Chocolate chip cookies are best when baked in one’s kitchen, in a home with adequate airflow—the aromas permeating the farthest rooms are as much a draw as the cookies’ edible pleasures. But sometimes this isn’t an option. It’s 9:30 p.m., you’re jonesing for chocolate chip and making-from-scratch isn’t feasible. That cute little bakery closed at 3 p.m. Your neighborhood supermarket is the only fix.
Store-bought chocolate chip cookies aren’t ideal, but neither is frozen pizza. Both are convenient, consistent, and scratch their respective itches. With Chocolate Chip Cookie Week ongoing, The Takeout was more than willing to suss out the merely serviceable from the quite good.
Here’s how this taste test was conducted: We brought back nine of the most popular, widely distributed brands of chocolate chip cookies (yes, we missed your favorite cookie; no, we didn’t do it on purpose). We laid out the cookies as seen in the photograph below, then invited a dozen taste-testers at Takeout headquarters to blindly taste each cookie, then choose their favorites. Here were the nine contenders, along with tasting notes:
Whole Foods 365 Everyday Value’s “Organic Chocolate Chip Cookies”
Top left in photograph
Nutrition (per cookie): 75 calories, 4 g fat, 5 g sugar
Tasting notes: With chocolate chip cookies you generally taste the cookie separate from the chocolate. For some reason this one tasted very one-note—the very sweet chocolate blending into the very sweet base cookie. You can taste the salt in this, too.
Tate’s Bake Shop’s “Chocolate Chip Cookies”
Top middle in photograph
Type: Thin and crispy
Nutrition (per cookie): 70 calories, 3.5 g fat, 6 g sugar
Tasting notes: This one looks the most homemade, the type of flattened, slightly over-baked cookie you bring to share with your office colleagues. The flavors are quite good, with butter most prominent. It’s baked dark and tastes like it too, with an appealing toastiness to each cookie.
Famous Amos’ “Chocolate Chip”
Top right in photograph
Type: Crunchy minis
Nutrition (per cookie): 35 calories, 1.75 g fat, 2.25 g sugar
Tasting notes: Perhaps we’ve been spoiled by so many cookies, because these resemble breakfast cereal cookies. There’s even a corn cereal-savoriness to these cookies, which is to say, they lack the luxurious butteriness that others have. They’re crunchy without being crumbly, and we appreciate the mini size for portion-control reasons.
Matt’s Bakery’s “Chocolate Chip”
Middle left in photograph
Nutrition (per cookie): 130 calories, 6 g fat, 9 g sugar
Tasting notes: Advertising itself as “soft-baked cookies,” these were indeed the softest of the bunch, a cookie that doesn’t provide much resistance to one’s teeth. Some taste-testers loved its moist and chewy nature, but for me, it tastes like it’s not fully baked. Texture is the draw: If you enjoy a cookie with a pillowy texture, this is for you. Flavor-wise, there are better options.
Organics’ “Organic Chocolate Chip Cookies”
Center plate in photograph
Type: Thin crunchy
Nutrition (per cookie): 75 calories, 4 g fat, 4.5 g sugar
Tasting notes: Something tastes off. Among the quotes from taste-testers, “Is this gluten-free?” “When I say I want a chocolate chip cookie, this isn’t it.” “Tastes like an oatmeal cookie masquerading as chocolate chip.” That last observation was on point: There’s a nuttiness (without any nuts) and an earthiness to this cookie, which someone else described as “an over-dried scone.” The chocolate chunks also appear minuscule compared to other cookies.
Chips Ahoy! “Chunky”
Middle right in photograph
Type: Thick and crunchy
Nutrition (per cookie): 80 calories, 4 g fat, 5.5 g sugar
Tasting notes: Lots of textural variance with the abundance of chocolate chips. This is the type of cookie that withstands a dunk in milk. The base cookie has a predominance of vanilla flavor.
Chips Ahoy! “Original”
Bottom left in photograph
Type: Standard crisp
Nutrition (per cookie): 53 calories, 2.67 g fat, 3.67 g sugar
Tasting notes: Tastes dialed-down compared to its “Chunky” brand. Crisp but not crunchy. The prevailing comment is that this is a “fairly standard” cookie—nothing remarkable nor offensive. It tastes exactly what you’d expect supermarket-bought chocolate chip cookies to taste like.
Pepperidge Farm Farmhouse’s “Thin & Crispy Milk Chocolate Chip”
Bottom center in photograph
Nutrition (per cookie): 70 calories, 3 g fat, 6 g sugar
Tasting notes: Exceptionally crispy, yet feels rich from the butter flavor. The cookies leave a milky, butterscotch note. Chocolate chips appear melted and integrated into the cookie, so you’re losing out on the chunky texture. But a very good cookie nonetheless.
Keebler’s Chips Deluxe “Chocolate Chunk”
Bottom right in photograph
Nutrition (per cookie): 85 calories, 4.5 g fat, 5.5 g sugar
Tasting notes: On the drier and crumbly spectrum, but offset by lots of chocolate chunks and a good butteriness.
The two favorites in our blind taste test were Pepperidge Farm and Tate’s Bake Shop. Both offered similar cookies: Thin, crisp, with a rich buttery flavor to the base cookie. In the end, slightly more people preferred the Pepperidge Farm cookies. And so we anoint Pepperidge Farm Farmhouse’s “Thin & Crispy Milk Chocolate Chip” as our supermarket cookie champions of 2018.